Home › Firm Disqualified Because Preliminary Injunction Is "Directly...
 

Keywords :   


Firm Disqualified Because Preliminary Injunction Is "Directly...

2015-02-14 00:30:05| Chemicals - Topix.net

Disqualifying Celgard's appellate counsel due to a conflict of interest, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a non-precedential opinion, found that Celgard's preliminary injunction preventing LG Chem from supplying batteries was directly adverse to the appellate firm's client who purchased batteries from LG Chem. Celgard, LLC v.

Tags: directly firm preliminary injunction

Category:Chemicals

Latest from this category

All news
26.11PPG Completes Sale of Silicas Products Business to QEMETICA
26.11¦nie¿ka Among Leaders of Sustainable Development in Poland
25.11PPG Recognized in Newsweeks Americas Greenest Companies List
25.11Axalta Wins Another Distinguished R&D 100 Award for Innovation
25.11Dunn-Edwards CEO Karl Altergott to Retire, COO Monte Lewis is Successor
25.11Global Market Insights: Auto Refinish Coating Market $17.79 Billion by 2032
23.11Weekly Recap: PPG, John Morikis, Sika Top This Weeks Stories
22.11Andrea Wagner Watts to Deliver Keynote Address at ACAs 2025 CoatingsTech Conference
Chemicals »
26.11yuma 1~60
26.11 GARMIN Approach S20
26.1135130
26.11HOTEL4 DVD-BOX
26.11 VHS
26.11 [LP] TRANSFORMER LOU REED
26.11
26.11 M
More »